Research landscape
Starts from the Related Work section and in-text citations to map adjacent research directions and explain where the paper sits within them.
An open-source AI review tool for researchers
Analyze your paper from multiple angles.
Revise with clear priorities.
CScope is an open-source AI paper review and revision tool for researchers. Given a paper in PDF or LaTeX and a target venue, it surveys the surrounding research, examines the method and experiments, checks consistency across the manuscript, and produces venue-specific review feedback and revision suggestions.
HUSTCCIIP Laboratory
Huazhong University of Science and Technology
Huazhong University of Science and Technology
One paper, one complete analysis8connected analysis modules
4independent review perspectives
PDF + TeXmultiple input formats
Open sourceself-hosted and extensible
Analysis workflow
A connected workflow built around the paper's central contribution.
Evidence from earlier stages informs later assessments, while every conclusion can be checked against the manuscript and the relevant literature.
Conference compliance
Checks page limits, anonymity, fonts, page size, and other format requirements defined by the target venue.
Method and technical approach
Examines whether the proposed method is coherent, whether key design choices are justified, and whether related work suggests viable alternatives.
Logical consistency
Checks whether claims are supported and whether the text, equations, figures, tables, conclusions, and appendices agree with one another.
Multi-perspective review
Reviews novelty, methodology, logic, experiments, and writing from separate perspectives, then combines them into a venue-aware assessment.
Section feedback and revision plan
Identifies problems section by section and turns findings from the full workflow into a revision plan ordered by importance.
Product overview
Project demonstration video
It introduces each analysis module and shows how their results feed into one another to shape the final recommendations.
Feature comparison
How CScope compares with related projects.
The table is based on product pages and technical documentation published by each project as of August 2026.
| Capability described in public documentation | CScope | Stanford Agentic Reviewer | PapeReview | OpenReviewer |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Open-source project | ✓ | × | × | ✓ |
| PDF manuscript support | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| LaTeX project support | ✓ | × | × | × |
| Multi-direction literature search | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | × |
| Visual research lineage maps | ✓ | × | × | × |
| Venue-specific compliance checks | ✓ | × | ~ | ~ |
| Detailed method and technical approach analysis | ✓ | ~ | ✓ | ~ |
| Dedicated whole-paper consistency checks | ✓ | × | × | × |
| Section-level revision suggestions | ✓ | × | × | × |
| Priority-ranked revision checklist | ✓ | ~ | ✓ | × |
| User-configurable models | ✓ | × | × | ✓ |
✓ supported · ~ partially supported · × not currently available
Documentation and source code
Learn how to run the project, how the system is organized, and how each stage of the analysis works.